# Dated chronology

Extracted without editorial alteration from the canonical report revised 10 August 2026.

Canonical source SHA-256: `76646098cb20403b14419fac93b5770d36d68ee8f2af8268c60729a2657c3614`

## 7. Chronology of the policing, April 2023 to July 2026

### 7.1 Phase I: first report, transfer, North Yorkshire investigation and withdrawal (April 2023 to January 2024)

| Date | Record | What the record shows |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 19 Apr 2023 | ISVA referral form | First report, made to the Metropolitan Police: crime reference CR:2710712/23, "reported 19/04/23". Skeleton report created by PC J Hesketh (257430) "at the request of CN OPS" (Central North). |
| 2 May 2023, 11:40 | STORM NYP-02052023-0181 | Met transfer email received by North Yorkshire: "Offence: Sexual Assault on a Female... Victim: Senn JACQUES... Suspect: Unknown... Victim alleging that she was abused by her school teacher 21 years ago. This incident is transferred to you for recording (as per HOCR)...". STORM persons record: "Classification: AGGRIEVED Gender: FEMALE Name: JACQUES, SENN". The call narrative in the same log names the teacher and records the operator locating press coverage of his convictions; the transfer nonetheless recorded the suspect as unknown. |
| 2 May 2023 | STORM; ISVA form | Occurrence 12230078064 recorded; routed to the Non-Recent Abuse Investigation Team (NRAIT); local qualifiers "Child abuse" and "Vulnerable child/young person"; ISVA referral made the same day. |
| 11 May 2023 | Occurrence log | Identity corrected on the victim's own information: "confirming correct name for victim is Fenn JACQUES and their gender is male". The inverted record had stood for nine days. |
| 19 May 2023 | MG15 | Visually recorded interview, Stoke Newington Police Station, 14:42 to 16:28. Full account as summarised at Section 6, including the Childline call, the contemporaneous police contact, the disclosure to the mother and the "deal with the school", and the statement that the subject had never had therapy before that year. |
| 24 May 2023 | Occurrence log | Initial investigation plan. Safeguarding view: "The suspect in the case is currently serving a sentence for historical sexual abuse at the school." Actions include: "Therapy and Medical Records to be obtained"; referral to Rape Crisis in London for ISVA support; VPS deferred pending charge. |
| 25 May 2023 | SurvivorsUK record | ISVA referral received by SurvivorsUK (case 8818). |
| 20 Jul to 10 Aug 2023 | SurvivorsUK record | OIC reports staffing delays; suspect not yet interviewed; mother not located ("not been able to locate of speak to mother yet" [sic], 10 August). OIC fails to attend the arranged Teams meeting of 24 July; the ISVA telephones 101 mid-meeting. |
| 5 Sep to 3 Oct 2023 | SurvivorsUK record; | Prison interview of the suspect postponed from 6 September, then 28 September (solicitor availability), then confirmed for 10 |


| Date | Record | What the record shows |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  | occurrence log | October. The log records difficulty obtaining a two-hour prison slot. |
| 10 Oct 2023 | Occurrence log (12 Oct); supervisor review (2 Jan 2024) | Suspect interviewed in prison. The OIC told the victim "he gave no comment in interview"; the supervisor's review records that he "gave a pre prepared statement and denied the offences". The narrative of the 12 October entry misdates itself "12/10/2024". |
| 12 Oct 2023 | Occurrence log | Outstanding actions recorded: "Need to speak to Fenn's mother"; review of "the boxes of unused material in the last case involving [the suspect]... for any disclosure involving Fenn"; review of "the previous investigation paperwork... with regards to Benjamin JACKS"; letters to former pupils. "Fenn states he does not want his mum being contacted... He did however disclose to his mum around that time what happened and it has been stressed to Fenn that we do really need to make contact with her." |
| 26 Oct 2023 | Occurrence log | Teams meeting. OIC "spoke again about the importance of speaking with his mum due to the fact he has said he disclosed to her when he was a child"; any contact would concern only the subject's time at Malsis; the subject asks to think about it. |
| 8 Nov 2023 | Occurrence log | The subject's written questions, via his ISVA, including: "To put it bluntly, the emotional strain of this process increases the risk of me having suicidal thoughts" and "If I don't give permission for you to contact my mother, will this prevent the case from moving to the next stage?" The OIC's recorded reply: "if we are able to speak to his mum and obtain as much evidence as possibly [sic], it is likely the CPS will charge, especially as he has bad character... The suspect is already serving a 18 year sentence and is elderly. It is likely if convicted he would get a further sentence as the offences are serious." |
| 13 to 15 Nov 2023 | SurvivorsUK record; occurrence log | Withdrawal. The ISVA record dates the decision 13 November; the occurrence log records receipt of the withdrawal email of 15 November and a Right 6 discussion on 15 November. The ISVA simultaneously warned that the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority "may see this as non-cooperation". The withdrawal letter cites the emotional and mental toll and the existing conviction of the suspect. |
| 26 Nov 2023 | Supervisor review | "The main issues here are the victim's vulnerability and the impact the investigation is having on his MH and wellbeing and the fact that he does not want the police to speak to his mum who is a disclosure witness." The same review records the suspect "currently in prison serving 16 years for similar offences" (the sentence was 17 years plus a one-year licence). |
| 13 Dec 2023 | Occurrence log | Final Teams meeting. "The suspect will be made aware that this could be the case and therefore it is not no further action because there is insufficient evidence to prosecute": the case may be re-opened if the victim returns. ISVA support extended three months. NFA letter to issue. |


| Date | Record | What the record shows |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 31 Dec 2023 | Finalisation request | Case summary: the victim "does not want her contacting and understands this would be an enquiry the CPS would be likely to ask for to consider charges." Suspect updated "by letter to prison". |
| 2 Jan 2024 | Supervisor review | Disposal recorded: "Sexual assault on a male child under 13", Outcome 16 (evidential difficulties, victim does not support; suspect identified). |

*Note on Phase I. The 2023 non-contact with the mother was at the victim's documented request; the cost of that position was equally documented by the force itself, twice, in the two quotations above. From January 2024 the position inverted: the victim demanded, in writing and repeatedly, that the mother be investigated and interviewed. Every subsequent failure occurred against that demand. See Section 8.2.*

### 7.2 Phase II: the Metropolitan Police investigation and complaint (January 2024 to July 2024)

| Date | Record | What the record shows |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 or 6 Jan 2024 | Met archive | Report made to the Metropolitan Police, crime reference 2700409/24. The force's own records give two dates: DS Fraser's closure email cites "the report you made to police on 01/01/2024"; DI Head's 19 March email cites "allegations of crime that you made on 6th January 2024". |
| 8 to 30 Jan 2024 | Met archive | OIC confirmed as DC Tasselli (8 January). DS Fraser, 30 January: "I will get back to you as soon as possible with a date for your interview to take place." First VRI appointment cancelled for "live risk" prioritisation. |
| 15 Feb 2024 | DPS complaint report | Visually recorded interview, Holborn Police Station, two hours twenty-three minutes. TDC Briedova interviewing; TDC Tasselli as control officer in the observation room. Free recall ends at approximately 53 minutes; past the hour Tasselli enters and imposes a break, on his own account "so TDC Tasselli could spend some time developing a structure for the interview as he was unable to complete this in the planning phase". The report records the subject's distress in the second half: he refers to Tasselli being "there with a buzzer saying 'NO'", describes the lift journey with Tasselli as "horrible", says "We don't gel" and describes being made to feel like a "twat". Tasselli's later account: "I just wanted to avoid speaking on incidents which had already led to the trial and conviction of others." |
| 4 to 14 Mar 2024 | Met archive | The subject provides Emily Jacks's details for the father's laptop and digital assets and asks what is needed for an arrest (4 March). Fraser: mother assessment "in the capacity of being a witness at this stage" (8 March); "I will not be arresting your mother because there is no necessity to do so" and "I will be making enquiries next week in relation to your mother" (14 March). |
| 15 Mar | Met archive | Formal complaint email naming DS Fraser and DC Tasselli, |


| Date | Record | What the record shows |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2024 |  | contemporaneously documenting Fraser's remark: "Oh, so shall I cancel the entire police investigation then? You don't want any of it?" and the interview restrictions ("explicit instructions on what I could and couldn't say... the abrupt end to the video interview because of DC Tassillis need of a break" [sic]). |
| 19 Mar 2024 | Met archive | DI Head refuses force transfer and change of OIC or supervisor: "I have not found any breaches in the best practice that police are required to follow when obtaining evidential accounts." |
| 27 Mar 2024 | Met archive | Closure, under twelve weeks after report: "we have completed all reasonable lines of enquiry in this investigation and we are not able to progress this any further." "A specialist trained officer has reviewed all of the e-mails in this folder and the attachments... found no evidence of indecent images." "The password to that e-mail account has been changed to 'Greentree71' I have updated Emily with this information." |
| 28 Mar 2024 | Met archive | DI Head, before any complaint is recorded: "I will say in advance that I am supportive of the decision to close the investigation." He advises the subject to "limit further contact with DS Fraser". |
| 18 to 23 Apr 2024 | Met archive | Subject, 18 April: "What was said to my mother? What did she say? I also have not got access to the email account because you gave away the password." Fraser, 19 April: "As confirmed previously, I have spoken to your mother, she did not provide any further information that assisted me in progressing the investigation. I do not intend to detail the content of our conversation"; and "I will not be responding to any questions about how you feel my conduct can be interpreted." Fraser, 23 April: privacy (DPA/ECHR) cited for non-disclosure; the reviewing officer "hasn't been able to provide me with full details" of what was examined; lines of enquiry "extremely limited due to the passage of time". |
| 8 Apr / 25 Apr / 30 Apr 2024 | DPS report; Met archive | Complaint PC/03332/24. The DPS report records the complaint as made "on 8th April 2024" (the archive contains the complaint email of 15 March). Recorded 25 April under a single head, "Dissatisfaction at the overall outcome of your crime allegation reference 270049/24" [sic]; five concerns subsequently "agreed via email on the 30th April 2024". Handler: PC Rita Panteli, DPS PSU Central North, the same command as the subject officers and reviewing DI. |
| 20 May 2024 | Met archive | Panteli confirms she holds the subject's "visually recorded account"; on query (he sent no video) she clarifies it is the police VRI. |
| 25 to 27 Jun 2024 | DPS report; rebuttal | Complaint report issued: recorded under Schedule 3, Police Reform Act 2002, "Handled proportionately otherwise than by investigation". Concern 1 (Fraser's attitude): "not been able to determine whether the service provided was acceptable". Concerns 2 to 5: service acceptable. The subject's same-day |


| Date | Record | What the record shows |
| --- | --- | --- |
|  |  | written rebuttal, 27 June: "Miss Jacks never had the password to the BT email/data account. The password was solely in my possession until the police took my Mac computer away... the police changed the password in front of me, on my computer... This newly set password by the police was then given to Miss Jacks, not by my consent, but by the police." |
| 8 Jul 2024 | Met archive | Panteli: "Certain aspects of this report will not be disclosed to you... in particular what was spoken between your mother and DS Fraser." Further correspondence declined outside formal appeal. |
| 11 Jul 2024 | Met archive | The Turkey disclosure (drugged and raped as a child abroad; grandfather as organiser). CRU (Sgt Stubbs): "please attend your local police station... which may involve contact with the Turkish police or Interpol." No crime reference issued from this disclosure in the thread. |

### 7.3 Phase III: Northamptonshire opens; Gloucestershire opens and closes (2024 to December 2025)

| Date | Record | What the record shows |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Early 2024 | Northants archive | Occurrence 24000017113 opened (2024-series reference). |
| 14 Mar 2024 | NYP SAR covering letter | North Yorkshire discloses its file (initial report, investigation notes, ISVA referral, officer's statement, interview copy) to Leigh Day solicitors under Schedule 2, Part 1, paragraph 5(3) of the Data Protection Act 2018, "necessary for the purpose of, or in connection with, legal proceedings (which includes prospective legal proceedings)". Prospective civil proceedings therefore existed by March 2024. |
| 29 Sep 2024 | Northants archive | First substantive OIC questions (DC Dempsey), with the warning: "without these enquiries, we will have no further investigative enquiries and will need to file the crime." |
| 8 to 13 Nov 2024 | Northants archive | "VRI available dates" discussed. The interview then does not take place for approximately thirteen months. |
| 4 Dec 2024 | Northants archive | Dempsey, 16:09: enquiries with "the witnesses you have provided" given as the basis for "Roy may be deceased... With this information, it is not possible to convict him- unless you are able to provide further information regarding him"; the same email reproduces a Met-supplied list of the topics of the 15 February 2024 interview and concludes "there is little gain for speaking on these topics again". At 17:38 the stated source becomes the mother: "When we have spoken to your mother, she has provided us with the description of Roy... It was through this conversation that we have thought that he is likely to be deceased." The subject, 17:43: "My mother was the one who organised this... Has she admitted to this? What has she actually said about Roy?" |
| 5 Dec 2024 | Northants archive | Dempsey, 10:40: "Regarding the description, it was brief- just stating that he was elderly at the time. I cannot discuss the exact details of the conversation had with your mother as she is a witness." The same email records the force awaiting Adult Social Services records concerning the mother's reported comments to care staff [A]. |
| 6 Dec 2024 | Northants archive | The subject's written reply documents the care-staff account that the mother "admitted she 'took the blame for everything'" [A as to the staff statement] and rejects the witness classification. Dempsey, 15:10: "I have now received the documents from Social Services and will be reviewing these in the next week"; "With reference to your mother- I will need to speak with my supervisor regarding the concerns you have raised." The subject asked twice in writing (9 and 10 December) whether the documents contained any acknowledgment by his mother; no answer to that question, and no product of the review, appears in the later disclosed record. |
| 21 Dec 2024 | Northants archive | Dempsey: "the crime will be filed pending upon the information we have discussed over the phone", before the victim's evidential account had been taken. |
| 9 Jun 2025 | Northants archive | Evidential Property Team: "If you do not contact us within 28 days as per Force policy the property may be destroyed." |
| 13 to 29 Jun 2025 | Northants archive | Subject: "I need written confirmation that an investigation into my mother's role is now open." The record documents that the only prior line, "Big Roy", was closed on the basis he was "probably dead", following a witness statement from the mother. |
| 24 Jun | Glos archive | Parallel Gloucestershire report naming Alison Jacks |


| Date | Record | What the record shows |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2025 |  | (CR/23708/25). |
| 7 Jul 2025 | Northants archive | Crime number provided; Dempsey: "I'll send an email to the MET for the video interview." |
| 28 Aug 2025 | Glos archive | DS Morgan closes CR/23708/25: "In the absence of any specific recollection of Alison JACKS committing a sexual act upon you and dearth of evidence... no reasonable grounds to suspect... the case will now be closed." The named suspect was never interviewed; Morgan's stated position was that "we must have reasonable grounds to suspect a criminal offence has been committed in order to interview a person". |
| 4 to 5 Sep 2025 | Met archive | Met subject access request submitted 4 September; Refusal of Right of Access issued the next day, 5 September. |
| 8 Sep 2025 | Glos archive | DI Ainslie's call summary confirms the allegation (forced impregnation, drugging, the DNA test request concerning Emily) and the complaint route; contains internal date confusion ("Thursday 25th September... call you again on Thursday 22nd"); records "you raised some points around the therapy you were receiving" (see Section 13.3). |
| 25 Sep 2025 | Recorded call | The follow-up call promised in the 8 September summary, audio-recorded by the subject (19:21 to 19:50 BST; DI Ainslie speaking, DS Morgan present). Challenged on the summary's inaccuracies, Ainslie concedes on the DNA point: "I misunderstood that and misrepresented it." His stated basis for the therapeutic-suggestion assertion shifts three times in the one call, ending in the admission that it rested on the subject's attendance at SurvivorsUK peer-support meetings: "memories may have surfaced" (Section 9.4.5). He confirms Alison Jacks will not be questioned ("That's not going to happen"), and the officers decline to say what "new and compelling evidence" would look like ("Well, I'm not going to suggest that"). The subject states he was never given the opportunity to make a formal statement; the counter, "long conversations with Gareth Morgan", is corrected on the recording to a single casual conversation while the subject walked his dog. The NFA letter issues eight days later. |
| 3 to 6 Oct 2025 | Glos archive | Subject formally demands the NFA letter and review rights, noting: "the decision appears to have been made without questioning the named individuals or taking the simple step of asking whether Emily would consent to a DNA test. That is the most direct way to resolve whether a serious offence occurred." The NFA letter dated 3 October, later the subject of the fabrication complaint CO/443/26, is provided on 6 October. |
| 21 to 24 Oct 2025 | Northants archive | The Met DI "does not want to say yes" to facilitating the VRI in London; Dempsey suggests Northampton; the subject (complex PTSD, cannot travel): "I have been trying to get this interview arranged for almost a year now", and offers three London venues available "24 hours a day". |
| 3 Nov 2025 | Glos archive | Complaint CO/1268/25 recorded (DS Townsend). |
| 11 to 21 Nov 2025 | Glos archive | DCI Shore-Nye reviews and upholds the closure: the allegation "has no evidential basis... based on feeling and not evidence." On 18 November he asks the subject to provide the "Admission" email (Alison Jacks: "Tom and Emily were being abused"); on 21 November he confirms the closure. |
| 12 Nov 2025 | Glos archive | PSD finalisation letter for CO/1268/25 issues, six days before the reviewing DCI's request of 18 November for the central evidential document. |
| 26 Nov 2025 | Northants archive | VRI booked for 3 December, Brixton Police Station. Dempsey: "We gathered your evidential account first, and will look to speak with your mother formally afterwards - usually by an interview. You'll be updated on this process and when this is likely to occur." |


| Date | Record | What the record shows |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5 Dec 2025 | Northants archive | VRI completed (booked for the 3rd; the subject's later correspondence records the 5th; the force never disputes it). Approximately thirteen months after "VRI available dates" and nearly two years after the occurrence opened. |

### 7.4 Phase IV: subject access breaches, the capacity gate, and the Northamptonshire closure (January to July 2026)

| Date | Record | What the record shows |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2 Jan 2026 | Northants archive | Dempsey: "the national database has been searched and there are no identifiable images of you on there" (CAID/VID search). |
| 12 Jan 2026 | All three archives | Fresh subject access requests to the Met, Gloucestershire and Northamptonshire on the same day. |
| 13 Jan 2026 | Glos archive | Gloucestershire ID initially rejected; accepted the same day after challenge ("I was probably a little over cautious on this occasion", Mr Turner). Response due "on or before 13/02/2026". |
| 15 to 19 Jan 2026 | Northants archive | DI Howe: case file recorded offence dates as 1988 to 1993 against a reported period of 1981 to 1997; "I have amended the dates of the reported offences as requested." Also: "enquiries are being undertaken into your mother... We are seeking to interview her regarding her involvement." |
| 16 Jan to 17 Feb 2026 | Northants archive | Serial ID demands on SAR AD26334/26 despite the force holding the subject's deed poll; request closed, then reopened; 17 February: ID accepted "despite initial verification not quite meeting our usual process standards"; "I am currently unable to give an expected date of disclosure." |
| 21 Jan 2026 | Met archive | Second Met refusal issued, then admitted wrong: "the refusal was issued in error due an administrative oversight" [sic]. Extension issued with the wrong deadline displayed. |
| 17 to 19 Feb 2026 | Glos archive | Gloucestershire, in writing, twice: "we acknowledge that we have been unable to meet our statutory duty in relation to your request"; complainants directed to the ICO and expressly away from the force's own Professional Standards and PCC routes. |
| 23 to 25 Feb 2026 | Northants archive | Howe: "every time we contact you our 28 day cycle resets, therefore please consider this when you are seeking further updates." Dempsey: "I am sent a reminder when 28 days pass, this is when you will be contacted." The subject's unrebutted same-day record: no substantive written update since the 5 December VRI. |
| 19 Mar 2026 | Met archive | Second Met written admission: "A system issue prevented the updated deadline date from displaying correctly, and a member of staff should have spotted this before the letter was sent... The deadline you have is not the extended one." Corrected deadline: 14 April 2026. |


| Date | Record | What the record shows |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3 to 9 Apr 2026 | Glos archive | Fabrication complaint concerning the 3 October 2025 NFA letter: (1) the "powder in my tea" mischaracterisation of an active self-protective account as passive delusion; (2) the claim the account "may have been shaped by therapeutic suggestion". PSD first misroutes it as an out-of-time review (8 April: the review date "has now expired"), then accepts it as a new conduct complaint (9 April). IOPC submission acknowledged 8 April (code 7693245), routed back to the force. New reference CO/443/26 issued 30 April. |
| 13 to 15 Apr 2026 | Northants archive; status record | Complaint CO/540/26 recorded (failure to investigate, chronic delay, evidence mishandling, Victims' Code breaches, the handling of Ann Edwards). OPFCC acknowledges 14 April and passes the concerns to a Detective Chief Inspector as relating to "a live and sensitive investigation"; PSD, 15 April: backlog "approximately 4-5 months", possibly longer. |
| 14 Apr 2026 | Northants and Met archives | Dempsey: Howe "has returned some actions regarding the mental capacity of your mothers" [sic]. The same day, the Met's corrected SAR deadline expires; the subject flags it within hours. |
| 15 Apr 2026 | NYP SAR covering letter | Subject access request made to North Yorkshire Police. |
| 27 to 29 Apr 2026 | Northants archive | Telephone call with Dempsey; the subject's contemporaneous, unrebutted record of 29 April: "she has spoken to my mother informally, and that the only reason a formal interview has not taken place is the question of capacity. That is the first time that information has been put to me directly." Twenty-seven minutes after the call, Howe emails: "I have asked DC Dempsey not to respond directly at this stage", declines the requested call, and gates any further evidence behind "An explanation of why it has not previously been provided (...you appear to have held this material for some time...)". The subject's 29 April reply demonstrates from Howe's own inbox that the material (Larkman voice transcripts) was offered on 2 April with an explicit request for secure-handling guidance, which went unanswered. Howe acknowledges the subject's intention to challenge any capacity-based decision. |
| 13 to 21 May 2026 | Northants archive | Call and written summary. Capacity enquiries via "colleagues in our Custody Suite as well as professionals in the Care Home". Howe: "it appears there is some uncertainty regarding which force is owning which investigation." The summary garbles "Briam LARKHAM", "Alison JAQUES" and "Steve JAQUES"; corrected by the subject on 22 May. |
| 2 Jun 2026 | NYP SAR | North Yorkshire responds to the 15 April request, late, with an apology; discloses the records in Section 2.1; confirms the 14 March 2024 Leigh Day disclosure; declines to review 383 identified emails: "Under Subject Access we are only required to review up to 350 emails. As this search exceeds this amount I have not reviewed the results." |


| Date | Record | What the record shows |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4 Jun 2026 | Northants archive | Howe, twenty-nine months in: working on "ensuring we can understand exactly what crimes are recorded, against which suspect, and within which force." |
| 12 Jun 2026 | Northants NFA email; rationale letter | DI Howe, 17:02: "We have been unable to interview your mother, and having reviewed the evidence in this case, I have decided to take no further action." And, in the same email: "I have also asked DC Dempsey to continue to seek further information from colleagues around the country to clearly establish which crimes that you have reported. This is to ensure that they are all accurately recorded and so that we can provide you with any reference numbers for your own records." The attached rationale letter (10 pages, crime reference 25000316894) discloses the basis of the non-interview: Ann Edwards "is subject to Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)" and, "Having sought advice from a Custody Sergeant on this matter, this means that your mother is not fit to be interviewed". It answers the subject's Section 4A Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 point by restating the evidential threshold; rests the evidential shortfall on the need for "a complete and coherent explanation" and on "your age at the time of the alleged offences, and the passage of time"; and sets the Victims' Right to Review deadline at 12 September 2026. Dissected at Sections 8.3 and 9.5.8. |
| 15 Jun 2026 | Status record | Preservation notices served on the Met, Northamptonshire and Gloucestershire, covering call recordings, 999/101 calls and metadata, VRI material, CRIS and occurrence records, offence-date correction records, records of contact with Ann Edwards and the capacity enquiries, the Larkman material, NFA decision logs and drafts, complaint files and internal correspondence. |
| 17 to 18 Jun 2026 | Status record | Final-deadline notices: Northamptonshire (17 June: ID accepted 17 February; four months overdue; even the maximum three-month extension would have expired 17 May); the Met and Gloucestershire (18 June). Northamptonshire replies 18 June citing backlog and the right to complain to the ICO. |
| 24 Jun 2026 | Status record | The Met, on 01/ROA/26/123653/R: no new information, no timescale for completion, high demand and limited resources cited, and "the Information Commissioner was aware of its position". |